4-manifolds in 7-space

From Manifold Atlas
Jump to: navigation, search
This page has been accepted for publication in the Bulletin of the Manifold Atlas.

The user responsible for this page is Askopenkov. No other user may edit this page at present.

Contents

 [hide

1 Introduction

Most of this page is intended not only for specialists in embeddings, but also for mathematician from other areas who want to apply or to learn the theory of embeddings.

Basic results on embeddings of closed connected 4-manifolds in 7-space are particular cases of results on embeddings of n-manifolds in (2n1)-space which are discussed in [Skopenkov2016e], [Skopenkov2006, §2.4 `The Whitney invariant']. In this page we concentrate on more advanced classification results peculiar for n=4.

For a general introduction to embeddings as well as the notation and conventions used on this page, we refer to [Skopenkov2016c, §1, §3]. Unless specified otherwise, we work in the smooth category. For the definition of the embedded connected sum # of embeddings of closed connected 4-manifolds N in 7-space and for the corresponding action of the group E7D(S4) on the set E7D(N), see e.g. [Skopenkov2016c, §4].

Remark 1.1 (PL and piecewise smooth embeddings). Any smooth manifold has a unique (up to PL homeomorphism) PL structure compatible with the given smooth structure [Milnor&Stasheff1974, Complement, Theorems 10.5 and 10.6]. Since also any PL 4-manifold admits a unique smooth structure [Mandelbaum1980, §1.2], we may consider a smooth 4-manifold as a PL 4-manifold.

A map of a smooth manifold is 'piecewise smooth (PS)' if it is smooth on every simplex of some triangulation of the manifold. Clearly, every smooth or PL map is PS.

For a smooth manifold N let EmPS(N) be the set of PS embeddings NRm up to PS isotopy. The forgetful map EmPL(N)EmPS(N) is 1-1 [Haefliger1967, 2.4]. So a description of EmPS(N) is equivalent to a description of EmPL(N).

2 Examples of knotted tori

The Hudson tori Hud7,4,2(a):S2×S2S7 and Hud7,4,1(a):S1×S3S7 are defined for an integer a in Remark 3.5.d of [Skopenkov2016e] or in [Skopenkov2006, Example 2.10].

Define Dm+,DmSm by the equations x10 and x10, respectively.

Example 2.1 (Spinning construction). For an embedding g:S3D6 denote by Sg the embedding

S1×S3g×idS1D6×S1i7,1S7.

The restriction of Sg to D1+×S3 is isotopic to (the restriction to D1+×S3 of) the standard embedding. We conjecture that if t:S3D6 is the Haefliger trefoil knot [Skopenkov2016t, Example 2.1], then St is not smoothly isotopic to the connected sum of the standard embedding and any embedding S4S7.

The following Examples 2.2 and 2.3 appear in [Skopenkov2002, §6], [Skopenkov2006, §6] but could be known earlier.

Example 2.2. Two embeddings τ1,τ2:S1×S3S7 are defined as compositions

S1×S3pr2×tkS3×S3i7,3S7,

where k=1,2 and maps tk:S1×S3S3 are defined below. We shall see that tk|S1×y is an embedding for any yS3 and k=1,2, hence τ1 and τ2 are embeddings.

Define t1(s,y):=sy, where S3 is identified with the set of unit length quaternions and S1S3 with the set of unit length complex numbers.

Define t2(eiθ,y):=η(y)cosθ+sinθ, where η:S3S2 is the Hopf fibration and S2 is identified with the 2-sphere formed by unit length quaternions of the form ai+bj+ck.

It would be interesting to know if τ2 is PS or smoothly isotopic to the Hudson torus Hud7,4,1(1).

Example 2.2 can be generalized as follows.

Example 2.3. Define a map τ:Z2E7(S1×S3). Take a smooth map α:S3V4,2. Assuming that V4,2(R4)2, we have α(x)=(α1(x),α2(x)). Define the adjunction map R2×S3R4 by ((s,t),x)α1(x)s+α2(x)t. (Assuming that V4,2(R4)R2, this map is obtained from α by the exponential law.) Denote by α¯¯:S1×S3S3 the restriction of the adjunction map. We define the embedding τα to be the composition

S1×S3α¯×pr2S3×S3i7,3S7.

We define the map τ by τ(l,b):=[τα], where α:S3V4,2 represents (l,b)π3(V4,2) (for the standard identification π3(V4,2)=Z2).

Clearly, [τ1]=τ(1,0) and [τ2]=τ(0,1). See a generalization in [Skopenkov2016k].

It would be interesting to know if τ(l,b)=τ(l,b+2l) or [τ(l,b)]=[τ(l,b+2l)]E7PS(S1×S3) for any b,lZ.

The unpublished papers [Crowley&Skopenkov2016], [Crowley&Skopenkov2016a] prove that

  • any PS embedding S1×S3S7 represents [τ(l,b)]E7PS(S1×S3) for some l,bZ.
  • any smooth embedding S1×S3S7 represents τ(l,b)#a for some l,bZ and aE7(S4).

Example 2.4 (The Lambrechts torus). There is an embedding S1×S3S7 whose complement is not homotopy equivalent to the complement of the standard embedding.

I learned this simple construction from P. Lambrechts. Take the Hopf fibration S3S7νS4. Take the Hopf linking h:S1S2S4 [Skopenkov2016h, Example 2.1]. Then

ν1h(S1)S1×S3andS7ν1h(S1)ν1h(S2)S2×S3S2S3S5S7i7,3(S1×S3).
Figure 1: Three intersecting disks spanning Borromean rings; a torus with a hole spanning one of the rings and disjoint from the spanning disks of the other two rings
The last homotopy equivalence is proved in a more general form Smim,q(Sp×Sq)Smp1Smq1Smpq1 for mp+q+3 by induction on p0 using the following observation: if f:NSn is an embedding, then CifΣCf.

(I conjecture that ν1h(S1)=τ1(S1×S3).)

Figure 2: The Haefliger torus S2k×S2kS6k+1

Example 2.5 (the Haefliger torus). There is a PL embedding S2×S2S7 which is not PS isotopic to a smooth embedding.

Take the Haefliger trefoil knot S3S6 [Skopenkov2016t, Example 2.1]. Extend it to a PL conical embedding D4D7. By [Haefliger1962, §4.2] the trefoil knot also extends to a proper smooth embedding into D7+ of the punctured torus (or disk with handle), see Figure 1. These two extensions together form the required PL embedding S2×S2S7, see Figure 2 for k=1. By [Boechat&Haefliger1970, p.165] this PL embedding is not PS isotopic to a smooth embedding.

For a higher-dimensional generalization see [Boechat1971, 6.2].

3 Embeddings of the complex projective plane

Example 3.1 [Boechat&Haefliger1970, p.164]. There is an embedding CP2R7.

Recall that CP20 is the mapping cylinder of the Hopf fibration η:S3S2. Recall that S6=S2S3. Define an embedding f:CP20S6 by f[(x,t)]:=[(x,η(x),t)], where xS3. In other words, the segment joining xS3 and η(x)S2 is mapped onto the arc in S6 joining x to η(x). Clearly, the boundary 3-sphere of CP20 is standardly embedded into S6. Hence f extends to an embedding CP2R7.

Alternatively, define an embedding CP2R7 by

(x:y:z)(xy¯,yz¯,zx¯,2|x|2+|y|2),where|x|2+|y|2+|z|2=1.

Theorem 3.2. (a) There is only one embedding CP2R7 up to isotopy and a hyperplane reflection of R7. In other words, there are exactly two isotopy classes of embeddings CP2R7 (differing by composition with a hyperplane reflection of R7).

(b) For any pair of embeddings f:CP2R7 and g:S4R7 the embedding f#g is isotopic to f.

(c) The Boechat-Haefliger invariant (defined below) is an injection E7PL(CP2)H2(CP2)Z whose image is the set of odd integeres. However, any PL embedding whose Boechat-Haefliger is different from ±1 is not smoothable.

Parts (a) and (b) are proved in [Skopenkov2005, Triviality Theorem (a)] (they also follow by Theorem 5.3 below). Part (c) follows by [Boechat&Haefliger1970, Theorems 1.6 and 2.1] and Corollary 5.6(b) below.

4 The Boechat-Haefliger invariant

We give definitions in more generality because this is natural and is required for 3-manifolds in 6-space [Skopenkov2016t]. Let N be a closed connected orientable n-manifold and f:NRm an embedding. Fix an orientation on N and an orientation on Rm.

Definition 4.1. The composition

Hs+1(Cf,)Hs(Cf)νfHs(N)

of the boundary map and the projection νf is an isomorphism. This is well-known, see [Skopenkov2008, §2, the Alexander Duality Lemma]. The inverse Af,s to this composition is `the homology Alexander Duality isomorphism'; it equals to the composition Hs(N)H6s(Cf)Hs+1(Cf,) of the cohomology Alexander and Poincaré duality isomorphisms.

This is not to be confused with another well-known homology Alexander duality isomorphism Aˆf:Hs(N)Hs+mn1(C) [Skopenkov2005, Alexander Duality Lemma 4.6].

Definition 4.2. A `homology Seifert surface' for f is the image Af,n[N]Hn+1(Cf,) of the fundamental class [N].

Denote by the intersection products Hn+1(Cf,)×Hmn1(Cf)Z and Hn+1(Cf,)×Hn+1(Cf,)H2n+2m(Cf,).

Remark 4.3. Take a small oriented disk DmnfRm whose intersection with f(N) consists of exactly one point of sign +1 and such that DmnfCf. A homology Seifert surface YHn+1(Cf,) for f is uniquely defined by the condition Y[Dmnf]=1.

Definition 4.4. Define `the Boechat-Haefliger invariant' of f

ϰ(f):=A1f,2n+1m(Af,n[N]Af,n[N])H2n+1m(N).

Clearly, a map ϰ:Em(N)H2n+1m(N) is well-defined by ϰ([f]):=ϰ(f).

Remark 4.5. (a) If m=2n=6, then ϰ(f)ϰ(f0)=±2W(f,f0) for any two embeddings f,f0:NRm [Skopenkov2008, §2, The Boechat-Haefliger Invariant Lemma]. Here W is the Whitney invariant [Skopenkov2016e, §5], [Skopenkov2006, §2]. We conjecture that this holds when mn is odd and that ϰ(f)=ϰ(f0) when mn is even.

(b) Definition 4.4 is equivalent to the original one for m=2n1=7 [Boechat&Haefliger1970] by [Crowley&Skopenkov2008, Section Lemma 3.1]. Earlier notation for ϰ(f) was wf [Boechat&Haefliger1970], BH(f) [Skopenkov2005] and (f) [Crowley&Skopenkov2008].

5 Classification

We use Stiefel-Whitney characteristic classes w2 and (for non-orientable 4-manifolds) w¯¯¯3.

Theorem 5.1. (a) Any closed orientable 4-manifold embeds into R7.

(b) A closed 4-manifold N embeds into R7 if and only if w¯¯¯3(N)=0.

The PL version of (a) was proved in [Hirsch1965]. It was noticed in [Fuquan1994, p. 447] that the smooth version of (a) easily follows from Theorem 5.3.a below by [Donaldson1987]. (The smooth version of (a) also follows from (b) because w¯¯¯3=0 for orientable 4-manifolds [Massey1960].) The smooth version of (b) is [Fuquan1994, Main Theorem A]. The PL version of (b) follows from the smooth version by the second paragraph of Remark 1.1. A simpler proof of the PL versions of (b) is given as the proof of [Skopenkov1997, Corollary 1.3.a] (for specialists recall that w¯¯¯3(N)=0W¯¯¯¯3(N)=0 for a closed 4-manifold N).

Any compact connected nonclosed 4-manifold embeds into R7. This follows by taking a 3-spine K of N, bringing a map NR7 to general position on K and restricting the obtained map to sufficiently thin neighborhood of K in N; this neighborhood is homeomorphic to N.

For the classical classification in the PL category which uses the assumption H1(N)=0 see [Skopenkov2016e], [Skopenkov2006, Theorem 2.13].

Theorem 5.2. There is an isomorphism E7D(S4)Z12.

This is stated in [Haefliger1966, the last line] and follows by [Haefliger1966, 4.11] together with well-known fact π5(G,O)=0 [Skopenkov2005, Lemma 3.1]. For alternative proofs see [Skopenkov2005, §3, §4] and [Crowley&Skopenkov2008, Corollary 1.2.a].

Let N be a closed connected oriented 4-manifold.

Theorem 5.3. (a) [Boechat&Haefliger1970, Theorems 1.6 and 2.1] The image imϰ of the Boéchat-Haefliger invariant
ϰ:E7D(N)H2(N)
is{uH2(N) | uPDw2(N)mod2, uu=σ(N)}.
(b) [Crowley&Skopenkov2008, Theorem 1.1] If H1(N)=0, then for any uimϰ there is an injective invariant called the Kreck invariant,
ηu:ϰ1(u)Zgcd(u,24)

whose image is the subset of even elements.

Here

  • PD:H2(N)H2(N) is Poincaré isomorphism.
  • gcd(u,24) is the maximal integer k such that both uH2(N) and 24 are divisible by k.
Thus ηu is surjective if u is not divisible by 2. Note that uimϰ is divisible by 2 (for some u or, equivalently, for any u) if and only if N is spin.

If H1(N)=0, then all isotopy classes of embeddings NR6 can be constructed from a certain given embedding using unlinked and linked embedded connected sum with embeddings S4R7 [Skopenkov2016c, §4], [Skopenkov2016e, §3].

For a classification when H1(N)0 see [Crowley&Skopenkov2016] and unpublished paper [Crowley&Skopenkov2016a].

Corollary 5.4 ([Crowley&Skopenkov2008, Corollary 1.2]). (a) There are exactly twelve isotopy classes of embeddings NR7 if N is an integral homology 4-sphere (cf. Theorem 5.2).

(b) Identify H2(S2×S2)=Z2 using the standard basis. For any integer u there are exactly gcd(u,12) isotopy classes of embeddings f:S2×S2R7 with ϰ(f)=(2u,0), and the same holds for those with ϰ(f)=(0,2u). Other values of Z2 are not in the image of ϰ.

Addendum 5.5 ([Crowley&Skopenkov2008, Addendum 1.3]). If H1(N)=0 and f:NR7, g:S4R7 are embeddings, then

ϰ(f#g)=ϰ(f)andηϰ(f)[f#g]ηϰ(f)[f]+η0[g]modgcd(ϰ(f),24).

The following corollary gives examples where the embedded connected sum action of E7D(S4) on E7D(N) is trivial and where it is effective.

Corollary 5.6 ([Crowley&Skopenkov2008, Corollary 1.4]). (a) Take an integer u and the Hudson torus fu:=Hud7,4,2(u):S2×S2R7 defined in Remark 3.5.d of [Skopenkov2016e], [Skopenkov2006, Example 2.10]. If u=6k±1, then for any embedding g:S4R7 the embedding fu#g is isotopic to fu. Moreover, for any integer u the number of isotopy classes of embeddings fu#g is gcd(u,12).

(b) If H1(N)=0 and σ(N) is not divisible by the square of an integer s2. Then for any pair of embeddings f:NR7 and g:S4R7 the embedding f#g is isotopic to f; in other words, ϰ is injective.

(c) If H1(N)=0 and f(N)R6 for an embedding f:NR7, then for every embedding g:S4R7 the embedding f#g is not isotopic to f.

We remark that Corollary 5.6(b) was first proved in [Skopenkov2005, The triviality Theorem 1.1] independently of Theorem 5.3.

6 References

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction